Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Marange v. Marshall

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 31, 1966No. 134Published

1ConcurrenceSharpe, Justice

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

I concur in affirmance of the judgment for the reasons stated in this opinion. In my view, some of the contentions of the parties merit additional consideration and discussion.

The question for decision is as follows: May appellants maintain a second action against the servant for the same injuries resulting from the same collision after they have successfully prosecuted the same cause of action against the master based upon re-spondeat superior and have recovered a final judgment in the former action, the full payment of which has been legally tendered to appellants but…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lovejoy v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  2. Houston Terminal Land Co. v. WestergreenTexas Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Hunt v. ZieglerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Ziegler v. HuntTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  5. Granquist v. Crystal Springs Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1941

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API