Legal Opinion

Whitacre v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 20, 1990No. 89-AB-422-A; CA A60926PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Claimant seeks review of a decision of the Employment Appeals Board denying him unemployment benefits on the ground that he was terminated by his employer for misconduct. We reverse and remand for reconsideration.

Claimant worked for Benton County as a utility maintenance technician for approximately three and a half years. His work included changing cylinders of chlorine gas, a process that required the use of a respirator in emergency situations. On November 1, 1988, county adopted a clean-shaven policy for all employees who might be required to wear a respirator. Claimant, a Vietnam War…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Langer v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API