Legal Opinion

Fenix v. Contos

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 5, 1967No. 392PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeyser, J.

The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction in chancery to restrain defendants from obstructing a right-of-way owned by the plaintiff in common with the defendants and other persons. After hearing and finding of fact, the court entered a mandatory injunction order and the defendants appealed.

The findings show the following facts. On January 20, 1964, the plaintiff acquired a rectangular parcel of land easterly of and adjacent to the rear of the buildings which house the so-called Lotus and Wishbone Restaurants in the City of Burlington. The deed to the plaintiff also included a right-of-way to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hooker, Corser & Mitchell Co. v. HookerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
  2. Howard v. HowardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
  3. Flint Et Ux. v. Davis Et Ux.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1939
  4. Lariviere v. LarocqueSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clohessy v. BachelorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  2. In Re Estate of SmilieSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
  3. Town of Dorset v. FausettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1975
  4. Wright v. NasalSupreme Court of Vermont · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API