Legal Opinion

Feder v. Friedman

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1911PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the City Court of the city of Hew York dismissing the complaint.at the close of the defendants’ case.

1Opinion of the CourtSeabury, J.

The plaintiff sued to recover damages for personal injuries. While walking in front of Ho. 654 Broadway, Hew York city, the plaintiff was struck on the head by a sign belonging to the defendants which fell from the fifth floor of that building. These facts, in addition to the injuries which the plaintiff sustained, were sufficiently proved by the plaintiff at the trial. At the close of the case, the court dismissed the complaint. From the judgment entered upon that dismissal the plaintiff appeals to this court.

Upon the facts proved, the case called for the application of the doctrine of res…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. . Van BeurenNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Morris v. Strobel & Wilken Co.New York Supreme Court · 1894
  3. McNulty v. Ludwig & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  4. Reynolds v. Van BeurenNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
  5. Reynolds v. Van BeurenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sottile v. RednickNew York Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API