Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Van Beuren

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided January 7, 1895PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from trial term. Action by Charles H. Reynolds against Alfred Van Beuren and others. From a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBookstaver, J.

This action was originally brought against the defendants, as lessees of the roof privileges and sign on the premises No. 1277 Broadway, and also against the owners of the building. At the close of plaintiff’s case the action was dismissed as to the owners of the fee, and the appellants contend that it should also have been dismissed as to them, on the grounds: (1) That the plaintiff had failed to prove that the appellants were lessees and in possession of the roof of the premises 1277 Broadway, or that they had erected or caused to be erected thereon the signboard in question for advertising…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Elwood v. . the Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Mullen v. . St. JohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Caldwell v. . New Jersey Steamboat Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Curtis v. . Rochester and Syracuse Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  5. Volkmar v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Feder v. FriedmanNew York Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API