Legal Opinion

State v. Decamp

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 29, 2012No. 09FE1560SF; A146540PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted, following a trial to the court, of six counts of sexual abuse in the second degree, ORS 163.425(1)(a), and three counts of unlawful delivery of methamphetamine to a minor, ORS 475.890(3). He appeals, contending, first, that the trial court erred in excluding evidence that he voluntarily took a polygraph exam and, consequently, that his convictions for second-degree sexual abuse must be reversed. We reject that argument without discussion.

In a supplemental brief, defendant further argues that the trial court plainly erred in calculating his sentences on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. SimonsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BarboeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. State v. FernandezOregon Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API