Legal Opinion

Oxhandler Structural Enterprises, Inc. v. Billard

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1980PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Herman Cahn, J.

Plaintiff (Oxhandler) moves pursuant to CPLR 3213 for summary judgment on a promissory note. Defendant (Billard) cross-moves for summary judgment on the ground that the note is usurious or for a dismissal or a stay of the action on *39the ground that there is another action pending for the same relief in New Jersey.

Oxhandler is a subcontractor and was engaged by various New Jersey corporations or partnerships controlled by Billard to perform work in the construction of buildings in New Jersey. By the end of 1978, the Billard enterprises were in default in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rothschild v. . Title Guarantee Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Interman Industrial Products, Ltd. v. R. S. M. Electron Power, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. In re the Estate of DaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. GTP Leisure Products, Inc. v. CannellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  5. De Tata v. TressAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Feinberg v. Old Vestal Road Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. In Re SeisayUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  3. In re McCoyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API