Legal Opinion
In Re Seisay
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 17, 1986No. 14-36330PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION ON MOTION SEEKING AN ORDER FOR A NEW TRIAL PURSUANT TO FED.R.CIY.P. 60(b)
HOWARD SCHWARTZBERG, Bankruptcy Judge.
The plaintiff, Gary Bernard, Inc., a corporate money lender, brings this motion for a new trial in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) on grounds of newly discovered evidence and fraud. The plaintiff claims that the debtor, Tinga K. Seisay, asserted at the trial of this case that he was the victim of a usurious loan, whereas in reality, he had allegedly enticed the plaintiff into a “sting” maneuver which caused the plaintiff to believe that the debtor was more gullible than…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jeter v. Ellenville Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Morris Philip v. Mayer, Rothkopf Industries, Inc. And Mayer & Cie, Gmbh & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- In re the Estate of DaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Bradley Bank v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, a Connecticut Corporation, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Washington Mobilization Committee v. Burtell M. Jefferson, Chief of the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re St. Stephen's 350 East 116th St.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- In Re Chipwich, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- In Re General American Communications Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1986