United States v. New York Racing Ass'n
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
This is a case of first-impression that requires the Court to consider the extent of its jurisdiction and the remedies available to address alleged improper interference with a court-appointed monitor. The court appointment of monitors in conjunction with deferred prosecution agreements is an increasingly common tool used by prosecutors in cases involving corporate malfeasance. Generally, the consensual arrangement places the monitor in an investigative, quasi-prosecutorial, and quasi-judicial role that is unique in our legal system. In…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. HensonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. SteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- In Re StabileDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006