Legal Opinion

Quigley v. City of Huntington WV

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided November 2, 2017No. 3:17-cv-01906Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION HARRY LAWRENCE QUIGLEY, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-cv-01906 CITY OF HUNTINGTON, WEST VIRGINIA; SHANE BILLS; CASEY WILLIAMSON; JOEY KOHER; JASON SMITH; and JAMES TALBERT, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Proceeding pro se, Plaintiff, Harry Quigley, commenced this suit under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

alleging, in relevant part, violations of his rights under the Fourth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment. Compl., ECF No. 2, at ⁋ 27-30. Per standing order, the case was referred to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API