Legal Opinion

City of Daytona Beach v. Caradonna

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 27, 1984No. 83-1189PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORFINGER, Judge.

The issue before us is whether a city may, by subsequent legislation, impair or reduce benefits to which employees retired for disability are entitled under the pension ordinances in effect at the time of their retirement. The trial court held that the right of the retired employees became vested at the time of their retirement in accordance with the provisions of law in effect at that time, and that these benefits could not be impaired or reduced by subsequent legislation. The City appeals and we affirm.

The appellees are fourteen disabled police officers and firefighters who…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anders v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. State Ex Rel. Holton v. City of TampaSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  3. Florida Sheriffs Ass'n v. Dept. of Admin.Supreme Court of Florida · 1981
  4. City of Jacksonville Beach v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1963
  5. State Ex Rel. Stringer v. LeeSupreme Court of Florida · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. O'Connell v. State, Department of Administration, Division of RetirementDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. Amsel v. City of Daytona BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API