Legal Opinion
United States v. Kelvin Dockery
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 9, 1992No. 90-3093PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge RUTH BADER GINSBURG.
RUTH BADER GINSBURG, Circuit Judge:
This case presents due process and Speedy Trial Act questions controlled by the panel and en banc decisions in United States v. Mills, 925 F.2d 455 (D.C.Cir.1991), reheard en banc, 964 F.2d 1186 (D.C.Cir.1992). 1 The Mills panel and en banc decisions held that the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia did not violate the federal Speedy Trial Act or the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment when he terminated prosecutions in the D.C. Superior Court and reinstituted them in the U.S.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. PaynerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Willie Bell, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Winford L. Stokes, Jr. v. William M. Armontrout, William L. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. Ronald Haynes, and Jahmal Rose, Willie Goldwire, Ronald Duran, and Natasha WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Frank Dave Clark, A/K/A TinkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- United States v. SnyderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- United States v. James Larry DeitzCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. BransonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.