Legal Opinion
Emerson v. Eystad
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 13, 1970No. 42056PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nelson, Justice.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant and from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial on damages only, or, in the alternative, for a new trial on all issues.
It appears from the record that on December 8, 1966, at about 7:25 p. m. a Great Northern passenger train was approaching the village of Clontarf, Minnesota, from the northwest, at a speed of from 77 to 79 miles per hour. At about the same time a cattle truck owned and driven by defendant, Melvin J. Eystad, was proceeding west on Grace Street…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Johnson v. TownsendSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Olson v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Merritt v. StuveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Minder v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Trudeau v. Sina Contracting Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dean Hales v. Green Colonial, Inc., a Corporation v. Harold Munroe, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Bannon v. PfiffnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- W.G.O. v. CrandallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Tomforde v. NewmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Dean Hales v. Green Colonial, Inc., a Corporation v. Harold Munroe, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974