Legal Opinion
L & R Farm Partnership v. Cargill Inc.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided July 31, 2013No. 11-2289PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY AND TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
SAMUEL H. MAYS, JR., District Judge.
Plaintiffs L & R Farms Partnership and James Steven Lewis (“Plaintiffs”) bring this action against Defendant Cargill Incorporated (“Cargill”) for fraud, violation of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act, Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-18-104 (“TCPA”), and a declaration that the parties’ contracts are void. (Compl., ECF No. 1.) On May 23, 2011, Cargill filed a Motion to Stay and Compel Arbitration. (Mot. to Stay and Compel Arb., ECF No. 7.) Plaintiffs did not respond to the Motion, but filed an Amended Complaint…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re No Place Like Home, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2016
- Dzurka Bros., LLC v. Luckey Farmers, IncDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024