Legal Opinion

Young v. Miller

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 15, 1856PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, C. J.

The plaintiff is indorsee of one of two negotiable notes, one for $300, the other for $750, secured by a mortgage. The payee indorsed the $300 note to the plaintiff, but did not assign the mortgage or any part of it, but retained it and the other note secured by it, and afterwards transferred them, and the assignee discharged the mortgage.

The plaintiff now brings this writ of entry to foreclose the mortgage, and claims that she had an interest in the mortgaged *153premises pro tanto, and that the mortgage could not be discharged in full, to her injury; and that, although the present defendant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jackson ex dem. Norton v. WillardNew York Supreme Court · 1809
  2. Green v. HartNew York Supreme Court · 1806
  3. Parsons v. WellesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1821
  4. Clark v. BeachSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1826
  5. Keyes v. Wood, Grant & Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1849

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Culhane v. Aurora Loan ServicesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
  2. Desmond v. Raymond C. Green, Inc. ex rel. Raymond C. Green Trust (In re Harborhouse of Gloucester, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
  3. In re DanastorgUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
  4. Eaton v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nMassachusetts Superior Court · 2011
  5. Fate-Root-Heath Co. v. Ceramic MacHinery Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API