Legal Opinion

Fate-Root-Heath Co. v. Ceramic MacHinery Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 1936No. 707PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By TATGENHORST, PJ.

This case is presented on appeal on questions of law from the Court of Common Pleas of Butler County.

One Ainlay verbally agreed to enter the employ of appellee as a locomotive sales manager. The verbal agreement resulted in a written contract, of which the following is a copy:

“In accordance with conversation today, we have decided to employ you as locomotive sales manager beginning the first of November.
“The compensation will be $350.00 per month with one percent commission on all sales. This agreement is for one year to be renewed for a longer period by mutual…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Young v. MillerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1856

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Finsterwald-Maiden v. AAA South Central OhioOhio Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API