Legal Opinion

E. Schock v. City of Lebanon

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 4, 2017No. E. Schock v. City of Lebanon - 40 C.D. 2017PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*862OPINION BY

JUDGE SIMPSON

In this appeal we are asked whose objections count toward determining whether a 40% statutory veto threshold has been reached under Section 5 of the Neighborhood Improvement District Act (the Act).1

In particular, Edward J. Schock (Objector) appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lebanon County (trial court)2 that granted the City of Lebanon’s (City) motion for summary judgment and dismissed Objector’s declaratory judgment action. Objector sought a determination that the 40% objection threshold for a veto of .the City’s final plan for a neighborhood…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pyeritz v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Malt Beverages Distributors Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Commonwealth v. Giulian v. Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Hammett v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
  5. West Penn Allegheny Health System v. Medical Care Availability & Reduction of Error FundCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schock, E., Aplt. v. City of LebanonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Schock, E., Aplt. v. City of LebanonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API