Legal Opinion

Epperson v. Rupp

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 19, 1963No. 63-220PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARKDULL, Chief Judge.

By these proceedings, the appellant seeks review of an order denying his motion to strike an “objection” to his claim in a probate proceeding. The initial inquiry is as to whether this court has jurisdiction to review such an order by final appellate proceedings. In this connection, our attention has been directed to previous opinions of this court, found in: In re Nolan’s Estate, Fla.App.1959, 114 So.2d 341, and in Birnbaum v. Feinstein, Fla.App.1961, 129 So.2d 164, which relate to this jurisdictional question. The first opinion indicates that such an order is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Nolan's EstateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  2. Birnbaum v. FeinsteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lipsig v. RamlawiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  2. Andrew H. Boros, Pa v. Arnold P. Carter, Md, PaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. In Re Estate of BrughDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  4. Kates v. MillheiserDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  5. Johnson v. Estate of FraedrichDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API