Legal Opinion
Kates v. Millheiser
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 13, 1990No. 90-1740PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
569 So.2d 1357 (1990)
Lester G. KATES, Petitioner,
v.
Peter J. MILLHEISER, M.D., Respondent.
No. 90-1740.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
November 13, 1990.
Marcelo M. Agudo, Miami, for petitioner.
Joseph T. Robinson, Miami, for respondent.
Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and LEVY, JJ.
LEVY, Judge.
Peter J. Millheiser, M.D., filed a cause of action in the county court against attorney Lester G. Kates claiming the attorney had failed to pay the doctor an expert witness fee. The county court entered a final judgment which held that the attorney was not responsible for the fee because the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Applegate v. Barnett Bank of TallahasseeSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- Department of Transp. v. MorehouseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Whipple v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Andrew H. Boros, Pa v. Arnold P. Carter, Md, PaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Blount v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McCARTHY v. RECORDEX SERVICE, INC.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Cruise v. GrahamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Norman v. AmblerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Jackson v. Allstate Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2000
- Marina v. LeahyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.