Moore v. Hubbard

Irvine, C.

In this case there are eight assignments of error. Of these the sixth is “ Errors of law occurring at the trial, and duly excepted to by plaintiff.” This, while sufficient in a motion for a new trial, is too general to present any question for review in a petition in error.

The seventh is that the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial. As the motion for a new trial assigns six grounds, this assignment is too general.

The eighth is that the court erred in not considering newly-discovered evidence and affidavits in support thereof. Accepting this as a sufficient…