Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. Walls

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 25, 1913No. Civ. No. 1141Published

1Opinion of the Court

The notice of appeal specifies that "plaintiff C. S. Baldwin, in the above entitled action, hereby appeals to the supreme court of said state of California, from the order of the superior court of said county of Modoc, sustaining defendant's demurrer to plaintiff's amended complaint in said action."

It is well settled that such order is not appealable. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 939; Agard v. Valencia, 39 Cal. 292; Ashley v.Olmstead, 54 Cal. 616; Hadsall v. Case, 15 Cal.App. 541, [115 P. 330].)

As stated in the Agard case: "The judgment is itself an adjudication upon the demurrer; and it is only…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Agard v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Ashley v. OlmsteadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Hadsall v. CaseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API