Legal Opinion

In Re Reapportionment of Town of Hartland

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 27, 1993No. 92-088, 92-136, 92-230, 92-259, 92-261 and 92-291Published

1Opinion of the Court

624 A.2d 323 (1993)

In re REAPPORTIONMENT OF TOWNS OF HARTLAND, WINDSOR AND WEST WINDSOR.

In re REAPPORTIONMENT OF TOWN OF MONTGOMERY.

In re REAPPORTIONMENT OF TOWN OF SHREWSBURY.

In re REAPPORTIONMENT OF TOWN OF BERLIN.

In re REAPPORTIONMENT OF TOWN OF SPRINGFIELD.

In re REAPPORTIONMENT OF TOWN OF RICHFORD.

Nos. 92-088, 92-136, 92-230, 92-259, 92-261 and 92-291.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

January 27, 1993.

Motions for Reargument Denied February 24, 1993.

Thomas O. Kenyon, et al., pro se, Brownsville, for petitioners (92-088).

Douglas D. DeVries, Enosburg Falls, and Michael Rose (on the brief), St.…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. White v. RegesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Gaffney v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Mahan v. HowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API