Legal Opinion

Young v. Bank of Miami

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 25, 1913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The statement of the allegations in plaintiff's petition by appellants is adopted by us, as the appellee concedes that it is substantially correct. The statement of exceptions and pleas of defendants will not be made, as we think our opinion will otherwise disclose the issues made thereby:

"This suit was filed in the district court of Hemphill county, on the 20th day of December, 1912, by T. M. Cunningham, L. B. Robertson, W. S. Martin, T. J. Boney, and others, a partnership engaged in a general banking business at Miami, Tex., under the firm name of the Bank of Miami, against D. J. Young,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Griswold v. HazardSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Kilgore v. Northwest Texas Baptist Educational Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Greenwall Theatrical Circuit Co. v. MarkowitzTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Page v. . KrekeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Kirchoff v. VossTexas Supreme Court · 1887

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Young v. Bank of MiamiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Bank of Miami v. YoungTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API