Young v. Bank of Miami
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from District Court, Hemphill County; F. P. Greever, Judge. Action by the Bank of Miami against D. J. Young, W. S. Martin, and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants, except Martin, appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtHuff, C. J.
The appellees instituted this suit as a partnership under the partnership name of the Bank of Miami, against the appellants, D. J. Young, Robert Moody, Thomas F. Moody, and W. S. Martin, the latter of whom is not appealing in this case. This suit is based upon a contract between appellants and appellee executed on the 21st day of September, 1912, in which contract it is alleged that appellees purchased from appellants the Bank of Miami, together with all of its assets, books, notes, accounts, etc.
The appellants answered the petition of appellees by general and special exceptions, general and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Murchison v. White, 54 Tex. 78 (Tex. 1880)Texas Supreme Court · 1880
- Drummond v. Executors of PrestmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Teagarden v. R. B. Godley Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1913
- Irvine v. GradyTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Garrett v. GainesTexas Supreme Court · 1851
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mayfield v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Phillips v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Cockrell v. WorkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Cockrell v. WorkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929