Legal Opinion

Habco v. L & B Oilfield Service, Inc.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 2006No. 05-216PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

[¶ 1] After settling a personal injury lawsuit, Habco and Harlan Hodge brought the instant suit against L & B Oilfield Service, Inc. (hereinafter “L & B”) and RIM Operating, Inc. (hereinafter “RIM”) presenting, among other claims, a claim for indemnification under the doctrine of equitable implied indemnity. The district court granted summary judgment to both L & B and RIM, respectively, on the equitable implied indemnity claim. We hold that, under the facts of this case, Habco and Hodge cannot sustain them claim for equitable implied indemnity against either L & B or RIM. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schneider National, Inc. v. Holland Hitch Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Gainsco Insurance Co. v. Amoco Production Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. ACT I, LLC v. DavisWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Davis v. Big Horn Basin Newspapers, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Diamond Surface, Inc. v. ClevelandWyoming Supreme Court · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Three Way, Inc. v. Burton Enterprises, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Cornelius v. Powder River Energy Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Madden v. Anton Antonov & AV Transportation, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API