Caraway v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
On Rehearing.
The Attorney General in his brief filed on rehearing seems to have entirely misconceived the import of charge 3. The charge does not undertake to define the defense of alibi, which in law is a traverse of the material averments in the indictment that the defendant did or participated in the particular act charged, and is comprehended in the general plea of “Not guilty.” Albritton v. State, 94 Ala. 76, 10 South. 426. But the charge is upon the burden of proof, which in a criminal ease never changes from the state, to establish the guilt of the defendant, from the evidence, beyond…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Albritton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Shirey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
3Cited by12 opinions
- Baker v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
- Cannon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974
- Brooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
- Webster v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
- Price v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.