Legal Opinion

Baker v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided July 10, 1923No. 4 Div. 862PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

The question was asked the witness Mrs. Baker by defendant’s counsel on her direct examination:

“If there was an easy way of escape from where Commodore [defendant] and that negro was.’!

The objection to this question was properly sustained as calling for a conclusion.

Defendant’s counsel asked J. E. Baker, defendant’s witness, “Did you tell Jess [deceased] to get your plow stock and plow-with it?” to which witness answered, “No, sir.” ' On motion by the state the question and answer were excluded. There was no error in this'. The testimony was not a part of, nor did it relate to, the res gesta».

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  2. McGhee v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  3. Roberson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  4. Clemons v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  5. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Lester v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  3. Lee v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Petty v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API