Legal Opinion

Erskine v. Klein

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 26, 1962No. 21610PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grice, Justice.

The issue here is whether a testatrix, at her death, had a devisable interest in certain real property.

Leading up to this litigation were a series of events which may be summarized as follows.,

James Lynch’s will, probated in 1899, devised two tracts of real estate in the City of Atlanta to his daughter Mary Ann Erskine, for life, with remainder to her children who survived her and the descendants of any of her children who predeceased her, per stirpes.

In 1911, Mary Ann Erskine and her eight children, one of whom, Vincentia M. Erskine, was testatrix of the will here, executed an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cushman v. ColemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  2. DeVaughn v. McLeroySupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  3. Knorr v. RaymondSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  4. Cowart v. SingletarySupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  5. Clark v. BakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Smith v. FrancisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
  2. Jack M. Thornton, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of John F. Scarborough, Jr., Bankrupt v. John F. Scarborough, Jr., BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  3. In the Matter of Christopher John McLoughlin Bankrupt. Marion B. Stokes, Trustee, Appellant-Cross v. Trust Company of Georgia, Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  4. Rush v. County of AroostookSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  5. Burt v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API