Legal Opinion

Weiskopf v. Second District Juvenile Court

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided July 8, 2005No. 20040489-CAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

BENCH, Associate Presiding J.

¶ 1 Attorney David Weiskopf appeals a final order of criminal contempt. ‘We review a trial court’s exercise of its contempt power to determine whether it exceeded the scope of its lawful discretion.” Shipman v. Evans, 2004 UT 44,¶ 39, 100 P.3d 1151. “ ‘In the absence of any action [by the trial court] which is so unreasonable as to be classified as capricious and arbitrary, or a clear abuse of discretion,’ we will not overturn the trial court’s order.” Dansie v. Dansie, 1999 UT App 92,¶ 6, 977 P.2d 539 (quoting Bartholomew v. Bartholomew, 548…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Taylor v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Sacher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Von Hake v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Ron Shepherd Insurance, Inc. v. ShieldsUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Shipman v. EvansUtah Supreme Court · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API