Legal Opinion
Cunningham v. Webber
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 5, 1935No. 22612PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBusby, J.
This action was instituted by J. C. Webber, one of the defendants in error, as plaintiff, against the plaintiff in error, as defendant, for the purpose of canceling a certificate tax deed and a resale tax deed held by the defendant and issued against lots 37 and 38, block 6, Floral 1-Iill addition to Oklahoma City, Okla., alleged to be the property of the plaintiff. W. A. Wise and R. C. Warren were later made parties plaintiff.
It is alleged in the petition of the plaintiff that the deeds are void upon their face for the several reasons stated therein and are clouds against his title.
The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lind v. StubblefieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Conners v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Swan v. KuehnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Michie v. HaasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Farmers Nat. Bank of Oklahoma City v. GillisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jenkins v. FrederickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Welborn v. WhitneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Parks v. LyonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- McAfee v. HardenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Gates v. MorrisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.