Legal Opinion
Bourgeois v. Murphy
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided February 28, 1991No. 17757PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BISTLINE, Justice.
I. BACKGROUND
The office of the Attorney General on behalf of the above-named respondents has *612appealed from the appellate decision of the district court of the Second Judicial District of the state of Idaho, Clearwater County, which appellate decision was as follows:
This matter is on appeal from the Magistrate Court which held that the EMIT-st test was a sufficient basis for a disciplinary action in the penitentiary and that the procedures for the chain of custody for handling urine samples is legally adequate. We reverse in part.
Appellant produced evidence that there is a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Hayward Leslie BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- Richard W. Spence v. Hal FarrierCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Storms v. CoughlinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- James L. Webb v. Ron Anderson, Superintendent, Indiana State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- State v. GilpinIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
- Schevers v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
- Sarah Marie Johnson v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
- Staff of the Idaho Real Estate Commission v. NordlingIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.