Legal Opinion

In re Nale Estate

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 23, 2010No. Docket No. 293802PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent appeals as of right the probate court’s grant of petitioner’s petition for forfeiture and revocation of benefits. Respondent argues that the probate court improperly construed MCL 700.2803, Michigan’s “slayer statute,” as preventing her, as one convicted of the voluntary manslaughter of the decedent, from receiving benefits from the decedent’s estate. We affirm. This appeal has been decided without oral argument pursuant to MCR 7.214(E).

I. FACTS

Respondent’s husband, Michael Stephen Nale (the “decedent”), was stabbed to death on September 13, 2007. Respondent was charged with…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Maher v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  2. People v. MendozaMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  3. People v. TownesMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Nation v. W D E Electric Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997
  5. People v. PounceyMichigan Supreme Court · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re DeCoste EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. in Re Coats EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. in Re Coats EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API