Legal Opinion

In re DeCoste Estate

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 20, 2016No. Docket Nos. 327990 and 327993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In these consolidated appeals, appellants appeal as of right probate court orders denying waivers of the probate inventory fee imposed under MCL 600.871. We affirm and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

I. FACTS

The sole issue presented in these consolidated appeals is whether the probate court must waive or suspend the inventory fee assessed during probate of an estate when the personal representative is indigent or receives public assistance. The inventory for the estates at issue in this case reflects that each estate contained only one asset—the decedent’s home.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. in Re Bradley EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
  2. In re Leete EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Wolfe-Haddad Estate v. Oakland CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. In re Nale EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. in Re Conservatorship of Rhea BrodyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Gerard Trudel v. City of Allen ParkMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. In Re Nothnagel EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API