Legal Opinion

Webster v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1941PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

Petitioner, James P. Webster, instituted this proceeding against defendant, Lloyd A. Fry Boofing Company, to recover compensation for an alleged accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment. It is his contention that as the result of a strain in lifting* heavy rolls of roofing he sustained a hernia or rupture.

Defendant is engaged in the manufacture of roll and shingle roofing, and was producing roll roofing when petitioner was injured on or about the 12th day of February, 1940. Petitioner had been in its employ for three years. This roofing was carried on a conveyer to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Frost v. Blue Ridge Timber Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Leonard v. Cranberry Furnace Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Moss v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Knox v. WasherTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Roehl v. GrawTennessee Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp. v. FrihaufWyoming Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Matthews v. Hardaway Contracting Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  3. St. John v. U. Piccolo Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  4. McMahan v. Travelers Ins.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API