Legal Opinion

Roehl v. Graw

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

This appeal is from a judgment awarding compensation to Mrs. Graw as the dependent widow of W. K. Graw, on the ground of his accidental death growing out of injuries received while in the employ of Roehl Company. It is insisted (a) that the record fails to show that W. K. Graw sustained accidental injuries resulting in his death; (b) that the record fails to show that Graw sustained such injuries in the course of, or arising out of, his employment; and (c) that the record fails to show either notice given pursuant to the statute, or an excuse for not giving the notice.

Graw was bookkeeper and…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marshall Construction Co. v. RussellTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Webster v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Templeton v. WilsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API