Rison v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
KEBBIGAN, District Judge.
Defendant in this case has moved for an order requiring the plaintiff to submit to a physical examination prior to the trial by a physician to be designated by the court. Defendant relies upon the authority of Camden & Suburban Ry. Co. v. Stetson, 177 U. S. 172, 20 S. Ct. 617, 44 L. Ed. 721, which held that, although under the common law the federal courts might not order such examination (Union Pacific Ry. Co. v. Botsford, 141 U. S. 250, 11 S. Ct. 1000, 35 L. Ed. 734), it might do so where the federal court in which the action was brought was in a state permitting…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. BotsfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Camden & Suburban Railway Co. v. StetsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Johnston v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Hanks Dental Assn. v. International Tooth Crown Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. KendallCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dixie Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. MatthewsMississippi Supreme Court · 1936
- Strasser v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1939
- Howland v. BeckCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932