State v. Smagula
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.
The defendant, Peter Smagula, was found guilty by a jury in Superior Court (Pappagianis, J.) of armed robbery, RSA 636:1. On appeal he asserts that he was denied due process of law under the fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution and was similarly denied his rights under part I, article 15 of the New Hampshire Constitution when, even though he remained a suspect, the investigating police detective failed to preserve an array of photographs, in accordance with departmental policy, because the victim was unable to identify the defendant in the array as presented. Finding no…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State v. MurraySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- State v. FowlerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. SteffesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Commonwealth v. HendersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Grimsley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
- State v. GiordanoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Gurley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.