Rice v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
John Mauzy Pittman, Chief Judge.
The appellant in this udge. possession of crack cocaine and sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment. On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred in refusing to suppress the crack cocaine found on appellant’s person because, inter alia, the search exceeded the permissible scope of a protective search. Alternatively, appellant contends that the evidence should have been excluded for failure to establish a sufficient chain of custody. We agree with his first point, and we reverse and remand.
In reviewing the trial court’s denial of a motion to suppress…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Howe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rice v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005