Fleming v. Law
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This action was brought to enforce the payment of a sum of money alleged to be due on a contract for furnishing marble to the Monadnock building in San Francisco owned by the defendant. The cause was tried before a jury and plaintiff received a verdict in the sum of $6,170.61, the full amount sued for, with interest. Judgment was rendered in accordance with the verdict. Defendant appeals from that judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
So little dispute is there over the facts that it may be said that they are presented without conflict. The controversy arises over the…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Joerger v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Bond v. WiegardtWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- D. L. Godbey & Sons Construction Co. v. DeaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Stern v. Sunset Road Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
- Welling v. CroslandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.