Legal Opinion

Fleming v. Law

California Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1912No. S.F. No. 5786PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

This action was brought to enforce the payment of a sum of money alleged to be due on a contract for furnishing marble to the Monadnock building in San Francisco owned by the defendant. The cause was tried before a jury and plaintiff received a verdict in the sum of $6,170.61, the full amount sued for, with interest. Judgment was rendered in accordance with the verdict. Defendant appeals from that judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

So little dispute is there over the facts that it may be said that they are presented without conflict. The controversy arises over the…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Joerger v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Bond v. WiegardtWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  3. D. L. Godbey & Sons Construction Co. v. DeaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Stern v. Sunset Road Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Welling v. CroslandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API