Legal Opinion

AmSouth Bank v. Looney

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 19, 2003No. 1020839Published

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSTONE, Justice.

The defendant AmSouth Bank appeals the order of the trial court denying the motion of AmSouth to compel the plaintiff Beulah H. Looney to arbitrate her claims against AmSouth. We reverse and remand with instructions.

Looney, a customer of AmSouth, sued AmSouth and its employee Helen Kendrick1 for invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress for disclosing information about Looney’s Am-South bank accounts to certain persons. Relying on arbitration agreements contained in the “Customer Agreements” between Looney and AmSouth, AmSouth moved to compel…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. v. BrunoSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. Ex Parte Greenstreet, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  3. Ex Parte Jim Burke Automotive, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  4. Ex Parte DickinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  5. Landers v. O'Neal Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API