Legal Opinion
Tapp v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 20, 2017No. Civil Action No. 15–0768 (BAH)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
III. DISCUSSION
The defendant does not dispute the plaintiff's account of his visit to the EEOC, Def.'s SUMF at 1 n.1, but argues that his deposition testimony and the record in the case demonstrates a failure to exhaust administrative remedies warranting judgment in defendant's favor on the plaintiff's gender discrimination claim, Def.'s Mem. at 2-4. The Court agrees.
A plaintiff may file a Title VII action in federal court only after timely exhausting administrative remedies before the EEOC. See Payne v. Salazar , 619 F.3d 56, 65 (D.C. Cir. 2010) ; Bowden v. United States , 106 F.3d 433, 437…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Mohasco Corp. v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Federal Express Corp. v. HoloweckiSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Coclough v. Akal Sec., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Coleman v. DhsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Fitzpatrick v. Amazon of SparrowspointDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Leal-Taylor v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Marcus v. Department of TreasuryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.