Legal Opinion

McCless v. . Meekins

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1895PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The main object of this action is to restrain the defendant, Meekins, who is the Treasurer of Tyrrell County, from paying into the general county treasury a special tax fund which the plaintiff alleges was collected for the benefit of himself. He also alleges that if this fund is so disposed of he will be without remedy because of the large indebtedness of the county, and because of the constitutional limitation which prevents a sufficient levy of taxes to pay its necessary current expenses. The answer does not fully deny this allegation, nor did the defendant file before his Honor affidavits…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Manufacturing Co. v. . SummersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Parvin v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  3. Johnson v. . WinslowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1869
  4. Pocahontas Coal Co. v. Henderson Electric Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  5. Whitfield v. Garris.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Parvin v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  2. Wallace v. Mayor of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Bank v. . Bryson CitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Glenn v. . Commissioners of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Wayne County Drainage District, No. 1 v. ParksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API