Legal Opinion

Queen Emma Foundation v. Tingco

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1992No. 15346, 15348PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

KLEIN, J.

Defendants-Appellants Aquilino and Adela Tingco (Tingcos) and Corazon and Lydia Ramiro (Ramiros) (collectively Appellants or lessees) filed separate appeals from the district court’s summary possession judgments in favor of Plaintiff-Appellee Queen Emma Foundation (QEF). On appeal, Appellants argue that the district court did not have jurisdiction to hear the dispute, or alternatively, that there was insubstantial evidence to support the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. We vacate the judgments because the district court lacked jurisdiction to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hawaii Housing Authority v. LymanHawaii Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Lum v. SunHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Harrison v. McCandlessHawaii Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Kimball v. LincolnHawaii Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hi Kai Investment, Ltd. v. Aloha Futons Beds & Waterbeds, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Ryan v. Tanabe Corp.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. 4000 Old Pali Road Partners v. Lone Star of Kaua'i Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Hawaiian Properties, Ltd. v. TaualaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Fukumoto v. OnogiHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API