Legal Opinion

Smartt v. City of Laredo

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided October 23, 2007No. 07-06-0291-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BRIAN QUINN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a permanent injunction enjoining Kenneth D. Smartt, Jr., Elizabeth Jimenez, Xotieas-Laredo, L.P., Xotieas-Laredo, Inc., K. Smartt Investments, Inc. d/b/a Xoticas (collectively referred to as Smartt) from operating a sexually oriented business in the City of Laredo (Laredo), Texas. Smartt contends that the trial court erred in granting the injunction because 1) the business does not “fit” the definition of “establishment” as used in the ordinance, 2) the ordinance is unconstitutional and 3) Laredo had an adequate remedy at law. We affirm.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. City of University Park v. BennersTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Priest v. Texas Animal Health Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  4. Lindsay v. Papageorgiou, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  5. Schleuter v. City of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. 8100 NORTH FREEWAY LTD. v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  2. 8100 North Freeway Ltd v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  3. In the Interest of T.B.S., a Child v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2023
  4. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2008
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API