Legal Opinion

Priest v. Texas Animal Health Commission

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided November 6, 1989No. 05-88-01417-CVPublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMAS, Justice.

D. Priest and Van Zandt Commission Company (hereafter collectively “Priest”) appeal from a permanent injunction entered by summary judgment, enjoining Priest from: 1) failing to maintain proper cattle ownership records for cattle sold through them; 2) refusing to allow Texas Animal Health Commission (hereafter “Commission”) representatives to examine such records; and 3) failing to brand cattle exposed to brucellosis. In two points of error, Priest contends that the trial court erred in granting the Commission’s motion for summary judgment because: 1) the summary…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Janus Films, Inc. v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  5. State v. Texas Pet Foods, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Texas Health Care Information Council v. Seton Health Plan, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
  3. Rugen v. Interactive Business Systems, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
  4. Jim Rutherford Investment Inc. v. Terramar Beach Community Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  5. Butler v. Arrow Mirror & Glass, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2001

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API