Legal Opinion
State v. Heinen
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided August 1, 1988No. 17015PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALTERS, Chief Judge.
The state charged Daniel James Heinen with grand theft by possession of stolen property. Heinen moved to suppress the contents of a briefcase found in his possession at the time of his arrest, claiming the warrantless search by law enforcement officers was illegal. The district court granted the motion and the state appeals. For the reasons explained below, we reverse the order of the district court.
On March 3, 1987, Heinen entered a motel room in Coeur d’Alene and met with an undercover operative employed by Transtector Corporation. 1 In that meeting Heinen allegedly…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- State v. BowmanIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. WeberIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. ParkinsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. HawkinsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. JulianIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.