Legal Opinion
Robbins v. Chipman Trucking Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 8, 1986No. 85 C 1489PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT
GRADY, Chief Judge.
This case is before us on the motion of plaintiffs, the individual trustees of the Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund (the “Trustees”) to alter or amend our memorandum opinion and judgment of June 24, 1986. In that opinion, we held that defendant Chipman Trucking, Inc. (“Chipman”) was not barred by its failure to seek arbitration from raising certain defenses to its alleged withdrawal liability. We then considered and rejected those defenses and held for the Trustees, granting them the withdrawal…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Miller v. FentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. RA Gray & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McGee v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Flying Tiger Line v. Teamsters Pension Trust FundCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- The Flying Tiger Line, a Delaware Corporation, Tiger International, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Warren Transport, Inc., an Iowa Corporation, & Counterdefendants v. Teamsters Pension Trust Fund of Philadelphia and Vicinity, A/K/A Teamsters Pension Plan of Philadelphia and Vicinity, and Charles J. Schaffer, Jr., Counterplaintiffs v. Central States, Southwest and Southeast Areas Pension Fund, a Multiemployer Pension Plan, Teamsters Pension Trust Fund of Philadelphia and Vicinity, a Multiemployer Pension Plan, Western Pennsylvania Teamsters and Employers Pension Fund, a Multiemployer Pension Plan, Teamsters Local 641 Pension Fund, a Multiemployer Pension Plan, and Central Pennsylvania Teamsters Pension Fund, a Multiemployer Pension Plan, Each Sued Individually and as a Member of a Class of Similarly Situated Multiemployer Pension Plans Who Assert Withdrawal Liability, Against Hall's Motor Transit Company, Under the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980. Appeal of the Flying Tiger Line, Inc., Tiger International Inc. And Warren Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Chicago Truck Drivers, Helpers and Warehouse Workers Union (Independent) Pension Fund and Paul Glover v. Louis Zahn Drug Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Findlay Truck Line, Inc. v. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- The Mason And Dixon Tank Lines, Inc. v. Central States, Southeast And Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.