Legal Opinion

John Marinclin and Goldie Marinclin, His Wife v. Mae G. Urling

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 25, 1967No. 16485_1PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

This appeal challenges the holding of the lower court that the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States is not violated by the grant of a way of necessity under 36 P.S. § 2731 to a person buying a lot, knowing that it has no access to a public road due to a previous condemnation of part of the lot for a limited access highway. The lower court accurately stated the facts as follows:

“ * * * A lot of land owned by plaintiffs adjoins a lot owned by the defendant; each has a dwelling erected thereon. Prior to 1961, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania condemned…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Winger v. AiresSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Marinclin v. UrlingDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1967

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Opening Private Road Ex Rel. O'ReillyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. T.L.C. Services, Inc. v. KaminCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Cirelli v. EntDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  4. In Re Private Road in East Rockhill Tp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Henning v. WatanabeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API