Legal Opinion

Turner v. Haynie

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided November 5, 1980No. CA 80-255PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Judge.

The appellants contend there is no substantial evidence in the record to support the workers’ compensation commission’s determination that the appellee is totally disabled. The appellee sustained a scheduled injury when his arm was mutilated, in the course of his employment, resulting in amputation between the wrist and elbow. The commission determined the physical injury, coupled with its aggravation of the preexisting mental condition of the appellee, caused him to be totally disabled. We agree and, therefore, affirm the commission’s decision.

It is clear from the record…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Corbitt v. Mohawk Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  2. Rooney v. CharlesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  3. Mosley v. El Dorado School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Haygood v. BelcherCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API