Legal Opinion
M.F. v. State of New York Executive Department Division
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 11, 2011No. Docket 10-2074-cvPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GERARD E. LYNCH, Circuit Judge:
This case requires us to interpret the little-known Interstate Compact for Adult Offender Supervision (“the Compact”), an interstate agreement that permits the transfer of supervision of parolees, probationers, and supervised releasees from one state to another. Plaintiff-appellant M.F. charges that New York violated the Compact by imposing certain conditions on its acceptance of his transfer from New Jersey’s supervision. Because we conclude that the Compact does not create a private right of action, we affirm the district court’s dismissal of his complaint…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Verlinden B. v. v. Central Bank of NigeriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Goings v. Court Services & Offender Supervision AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- State v. Harry W. BrownSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2016
- Wofford v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Continental Terminals, Inc. v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- 12 Percent Logistics, Inc. v. Unified Carrier Registration Plan BoardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.